|
| | #21 (permalink) | |
| Humanist | Quote:
You guys make great guides... That's not one of my behaviors as an EII. | |
| | |
| | #23 (permalink) |
| Humanist | SEE-Actresses Mariah Carey, Jennifer Lopez, Michele Pfeiffer, Lisa Kudrow, Madonna, Liza Minnelli, Meg Ryan, Shakira, Sharon Stone, Shania Twain, Renee Zellweger, Nicole Kidman, Faith Hill, Kate Winslet, Maria Sharapova, Paula Abdul, Amy Adams, Joey Lauren, Christina Aguilera, Pamela Anderson, Jennifer Aniston, Diora Baird, Kate Beckinsale, Mariah Carey, Cameron Diaz, Janice Dickenson, Gwyneth Paltrow, Cher, Leslie Mann, Ellen Barkin SEE-Actors Brad Pitt, Elvis Presley, Denzel Washington, Val Kilmer, Tom Hanks, Anthony Hopkins, Ben Affleck, Jack Black, Dean Cane, Jim Carrey, Billy Crystal, Brendan Fraser, Danny DeVito, Kevin Spacey, Laurence Fishburne, Frank Sinatra, Woody Harrelson, Ed Harris, John Lequizamo, Philip Seymour, Jon Voight, Billy Crystal, James Gandolfini, Jared Leto, Sidney Poitier, Rob Schneider, Christopher Walken, Barry Watson |
| | |
| | #25 (permalink) | |
| Member Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 178
| Quote:
Sorry I was referring to the SEE traits that Jarno saw in Mika Tan. Thanks for the list anyway.
__________________ ![]() | |
| | |
| | #26 (permalink) |
| Senior member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Netherlands
Posts: 3,933
| popular bling challenging openly sexual jokes (but hey she's a pornstar) extravagant clothing energetic Though I must say, she could be another type, but SEE is a good contender. Whether or not she is SEE, she looks like one in her dressing and behaviour.
__________________ ILI-Te |
| |
| | #28 (permalink) |
| Inexorable Tunes | Maritsa: Madonna is ESTp, Danny DeVito is Alpha SF, Christopher Walken is something else, most likely LII, Cher is said to be SEI, in any case Fe type, Sharon Stone probably Beta, Brad Pitt LIE, and so on. Your lists are complete crap, you're a lunatic typing randomly.
__________________ Shock Intuition, Diamond Logic --- "Δ slept with her" "Γ made love to her" "Β had sex with her" "Α fu**ed her" |
| |
| | #30 (permalink) | |
| Inexorable Tunes | Yes she did. I rubbed my eyes and Walken was still there Quote:
.
__________________ Shock Intuition, Diamond Logic --- "Δ slept with her" "Γ made love to her" "Β had sex with her" "Α fu**ed her" | |
| |
| | #31 (permalink) |
| God whispers close to my ears |
Maritsa, why don't you worry more about spreading that virus?
__________________ "United States of America, I thank you for ruining all the pillars of Western and Eastern Civilizations. Your contributions to Humankind can be summarized as absolute and negative debt, and now the whole of your people drown themselves into the capillary 'deepness' of the water-mirrors of their birdbath souls." - The Spirit of Plato through mediumistic sessions |
| | |
| | #32 (permalink) | |
| barren tongues Join Date: Apr 2009 Sociotype: Ti-ENTp 5w6sp/so
Posts: 4,380
| Quote:
edit: Something noteworthy is his strong Se value shown in his humor, something I relate to doing from time to time (in the same sense that I get around to Se from time to time) and value and value those who understand, which to put if briefly, is finding humor in appearances. An Se valuer is more likely to laugh at something that sounds funny even if its not funny, like someone's name, for instance. It's a much more appearances--->imagination, Se---->Ni, built technique. A lot of Ne/Si types I find are a lot more serious in this regard, in that they typically don't attribute any thought to the surface appearance (Se) and what the surface appearance stands for underneath (Ni), but rather aim for the more guessing because clueless, open to various interpretations and possibilities, partly because they don't have introverted judgment paired with the sensory function, and partly because of the nature of Se valuing. A humor in simple appearance somewhat akin to something an idiot-savant type of humorist might appreciate, which has immature qualities, is less appealing to judicious types, from what I have seen. There are some self-typed Alphas in this community that come across much more like Beta (LSI) partly for this reason, and lack what Ne actually is. Last edited by polikujm; 04-23-2010 at 04:46 AM. | |
| |
| | #33 (permalink) | |
| Inexorable Tunes | Quote:
So you say that you're on the laughing @ appearances, or you're on any side, depending on your mood? Edit: yes, yes for sure it applies to that dichotomy: Introverted + Internal or Extroverted + External. The experience convinced me about this: for example a lot LSEs may laugh at this thing, I remember so clearly I had an LSE workmate (manager) who was laughing at such things from time to time, for example when someone was joining together two words in speech resulting something embarrassing or funny from that, and the opposite, Beta Rationals are much more sober about this. Also, I remember in my first steps in typing, when I was looking for compatibility issues, that I read on the Personality Page that I'd be compatible with INFj (the personalitypage.com INFj/INFp descriptions correspond to the Socionics types) - but I was always found them frivolous as in humor, "laughing at circumstantial crap without any deeper realism". For example to people who make faces, circus stuff, clowns (I hate clowns!!) or unfortunate double meaning of some words. So: - laughing at appearances: all Ni/Se types, with a lesser extent on Merry Rationals - avoiding laughing at appearances: Ne/Si types, with a lesser extent Serious Rationals. That is! Edit2: I noted that cacophony is taken seriously by these types above. I personally find it ridiculous, to avoid joining different words because they could affect your image, or whatever such things, but others indeed are concerned about it, sounds like foolish mistakes for them. There's one more thing I remember connected to this: once I was working with an ILI and we were alone in one room of the workplace, the guy liked to make atmosphere there, to look as a mysterious "geek room". One guy (SLI) entered the room and asked some questions about that (I think about the light and closed door), and jokingly, I said that it's for intimacy. The ILI jumped up like burned asking what do I mean, maybe do I mean "privacy" instead? I confirmed, and they told me that although in the context the words would have similar meaning, "intimacy" should be avoided for its connotations (I assume the sexual ones). I felt so... jeez, it sucked! I became very formal with the ILI guy and was talking to him only what was necessary.
__________________ Shock Intuition, Diamond Logic --- "Δ slept with her" "Γ made love to her" "Β had sex with her" "Α fu**ed her" Last edited by Pied Piper; 04-23-2010 at 10:18 AM. | |
| |
| | #34 (permalink) |
| Simba's Identical |
May as well contribute. Marko Saaresto: Se sub? ![]() Kylie Minogue: Fi sub ![]() Amy Yasbeck: Fi sub ![]() Guy Fieri?: Fi sub?
__________________ "And above all, watch with glittering eyes the whole world around you because the greatest secrets are always hidden in the most unlikely places. Those who don't believe in magic will never find it." -Roald Dahl |
| | |
| | #35 (permalink) | |
| Inexorable Tunes | It seems you tend to see everything the reverse than it is. Anyone told you this before? For the record, I type Kylie as ESE. Quote:
__________________ Shock Intuition, Diamond Logic --- "Δ slept with her" "Γ made love to her" "Β had sex with her" "Α fu**ed her" | |
| |
| | #36 (permalink) |
| Simba's Identical | You'd be the first, hot stuff~
__________________ "And above all, watch with glittering eyes the whole world around you because the greatest secrets are always hidden in the most unlikely places. Those who don't believe in magic will never find it." -Roald Dahl |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |