Parkster

Inspired by Rubicon's Si-SEIs thread.

Matt Groening

__________________

Creepy-Cyclops

How can he be ISTp? he doesn't have a moustache

Rubicon

Maybe he shaved it off?

__________________

Thanks Arthur

ISTjs are the ones with the moustaches.

__________________

C//
This link contains extraverted ethics.
9w8-4w5-7w6 sx/sp
Hartman Yellow/White
Oldham Mercurial/Self-Sacrificing
Nohari

Galen

How about Dick Van Dyke?


There's a slight change of him being ISFp, but I'd lean delta.

__________________
Fi-ENFp
6w5 sx/sp
orz

VixenDogFox

Dick Van Dyke is his own entity.

Basically he's a DVD(Loco-E)...

__________________
SLI

Galen

Hey I love Dick Van Dyke :<

I've been considering Jeff Foxworthy as Si-ISTp too, but I have no real way of backing that up.

__________________
Fi-ENFp
6w5 sx/sp
orz

VixenDogFox

I'm just joking... but he is crazy!

__________________
SLI

Parkster

Are you fucking blind?

__________________

Creepy-Cyclops

That was the joke.

polikujm

ISTps are so undesirable sometimes. Hah. Can't say it's completely my fault, my type leans toward the Beta side. Blame Aushra.

__________________
Vote for my type

Maritsa33

That's BS...ISTp's are smart, fun, funny, very good looking, tallented actors and actresses, emotionally live and vivid, usually have one of the best muscular built bodies around...
With a combination of the brains and looks, no wonder why they get soooo much attention.

Dick Van Dyke is SLI

__________________

Enneagram 2w1

Parkster

I don't find you very desirable either, dick.

__________________

polikujm

I don't care much for dick either.

__________________
Vote for my type

Creepy-Cyclops

What about the dumb, boring, ugly and untalented actors and actresses ISTp's? Or the ISTp's who don't show much emotions and are skinny or fat?

You have such a naive impression of what socionics personality theory describes.

Maritsa33

Then you never know what kind of lives people have or had.

__________________

Enneagram 2w1

Creepy-Cyclops

Edit: Sigh, socionics doesn't explain IQ, or being born with an attractive face, among the other things, it just tries to explain a preference for processing information.

Maritsa33

I know that, but when the preference comes with certain physiological features, what can you do?
I don't think I am the best looking person; my LSE cousin is by far better looking then I am.

__________________

Enneagram 2w1

Creepy-Cyclops

Well you said:

And then you say you already know that:

So on one hand you are saying ISTp's are smart and attractive, and then you are also saying that you know ISTp's can be low IQ and ugly.

You make no sense, and then take pop shots like:

Even although you are agreeing that knowing people that we are bound to come across low IQ (dumb) and ugly featured ISTp's.

Not forgetting the fact that ISTp's are Fe PoLR so it's indeed highly unusual to come across one that's "emotionally live and vivid".

So I don't even know what you are trying to do or say, but what you do is senselessly argue and make big false proclamations.

Another example: You've already told me I know jack about socionics, then illustrated it with an example of something I never said.

Don't you think, on the basis of this, that you are better off being ignored?

Personally, I'd like to know why you are doing the sort of things i've highlighted, it would help me understand you (cause i'm curious) and it might help determine what your type is.

Maritsa33

What? I never said they are low IQ and ugly, I wouldn't call any individual those things. Fe has nothing to do with emotions, being excited, live or vivid, or correct expression of in SLI...
You don't know socionics because you don't know the use of functions in an individual; ISTp have Fe as polr because they can not fully use this function, so they say things to bring people up to display emotions in incorrect use of emotional or phrase like manner...ignoring them, calling them names, pushing them away, pulling people near...they don't trust other's emotions...really, you have no clue...

This function reflects person's own emotions, his/her emotional, highly personal and passionate reaction to what is going on around. Types with this dominant functions are eloquent, often smiling, artistic, charming (but somewhat “fussy” and “too artistic”), can speak and persuade others, but they perceive situations too emotionally, too personally, and sometimes they “sink” in their own emotions, cannot calm down for long time.

Unlike Fe dominent they don't have full control and understand how to give an appropriate reaction for instance. Sometimes they over react, sometimes they underreact, sometimes they do things to pull reactions; only IEE understands which way to react at what times necessary to establish harmony with their dual.

I have dated SLI, and I can tell you that these extremes are not easy to deal with; the only one I figured out was when they are very intensly quiet and stressed, they don't say much and work very hard, in this case, being supportive, physical demonstration of affection works very well.

__________________

Enneagram 2w1