• Welcome to the16types Socionics forum!

    Introduction to Socionics


    Socionics is a theory of information processing and personality type, distinguished by its information model of the psyche, called Model A, and a model of interpersonal relations. It incorporates Carl Jung's work on Psychological Types with Antoni Kępiński's theory of information metabolism. Socionics is a modification of Jung's personality type theory that uses eight psychic functions. These functions process information at varying levels of competency and interact with the corresponding function in other individuals, giving rise to predictable reactions and impressions—a theory of intertype relations.


    Socionics was developed in the 1970s and '80s, primarily by the Lithuanian researcher Aušra Augustinavičiūtė, an economist, sociologist, and dean of the Vilnius Pedagogical University's department of family science. A. Augustinavičiūtė has later shortened her last name from "Augustinavichiute" to "Augusta" to make it easier to spell for foreigners. The name "socionics" is derived from the word "society", because A. Augusta believed that each personality type has a distinct purpose in society, which can be described and explained by socionics. Augusta created symbols to represent the functions described by Carl Jung and — together with a circle of fellow researchers/hobbyists — eventually created what is known as the "socionic model of the psyche" — a description of the psyche where each of the 8 information elements has its place in each person's psyche.


    The central idea of socionics is that information is intuitively divisible into eight categories, called information aspects or information elements, which a person's psyche processes using eight psychological functions. Each sociotype has a different correspondence between functions and information elements, which results in different ways of perceiving, processing, and producing information. This in turn results in distinct thinking patterns, values, and responses to arguments, all of which are encompassed within socionic type. Socionics' theory of intertype relations is based on the interaction of these functions between types.


    Read More...
  • What's New? RSS Feed

    by Published on 09-30-2011 07:38 AM  Number of Views: 123 
    1. Categories:
    2. Socionics,
    3. IEE - ENFp,
    4. Additional translation required

    Stratiyevskaya: ENFp profile


    [machine translation-further translation needed]
    http://socionika-forever.blogspot.co...blog-post.html


    Ne Block of Ego, 1st position, Program Function: "Intuition ...
    by Published on 09-30-2011 07:36 AM  Number of Views: 152 
    1. Categories:
    2. Socionics,
    3. LSE - ESTj,
    4. Additional translation required

    ESTj profile by Stratiyevskaya


    (partial translation-further translation needed)

    Te Block of Ego, 1st position, Program function: "Logic of Actions"

    LSE relies first of all on his personal ...
    by Published on 09-30-2011 07:33 AM  Number of Views: 232 
    1. Categories:
    2. Socionics,
    3. ILI - INTp,
    4. Additional translation required

    INTp profile by Stratiyevskaya


    (partial translation-further translation needed)

    Ni Block of Ego, 1st position, Program Function: "Intuition of Time"

    Balzac lives according to the principle ...
    by Published on 09-30-2011 07:28 AM  Number of Views: 92 
    1. Categories:
    2. Socionics,
    3. SEI - ISFp,
    4. Additional translation required

    ISFp profile by Stratiyevskaya


    (machine translation-further translation needed)


    Si Block of Ego, 1st position, Program Function: "Sensing of Experiences"

    Beauty and accordion ...
    by Published on 09-30-2011 04:55 AM  Number of Views: 9464 
    1. Categories:
    2. Socionics,
    3. Intertype Relations,
    4. Quadra
    Article Preview




    Erotic Attitudes


    If you are coming from MBTI please note that Socionics assigns j/p letters differently than MBTI. Do not translate your MBTI type directly to Socionics type - this will lead to erroneous interpretation of your intertype relations. To read how Socionics is different to MBTI visit the introduction to socionics page. To find out your Socionics type, you can take socionics tests located at the bottom of this article, read through type and subtype descriptions, find your valued information elements, or make a thread in What's My Type subforum and ask for advice of other forum members.

    If you have questions about socionics, you can also ask them in the forum chatbox. To get access to the forum chatbox, please make yourself known by posting an introduction to get your account activated, ...
    by Published on 09-30-2011 03:10 AM  Number of Views: 205 
    1. Categories:
    2. MBTI

    MBTI: Profiles of Cognitive Functions
    by elaminopy



    Introverted Intuition: INTJ and INFJ Types


    Like the other Perceiving functions, Ni draws our attention to immediate sensory phenomena. However, Ni is more cerebral than the other three. It prompts an interest in perception itself--the process of recognizing and interpreting what we take in.

    Whatever types we happen to be, we use all four means of Perception in one way or another. For example, if we were spending a day at the beach:
    • Se would prompt us to go with our sense impressions as they occurred: to lie in the sun, play in the surf, listen to the gulls piping overhead.
      Si would move us to stabilize our sense impressions by integrating them with facts we knew to be consistent. We might bring our favorite book, a snorkel and flippers, a bag of snacks, extra towels because someone will probably forget one, and a watch to make sure we beat the traffic home.
    • Ne would move us to unify our sense impressions with their larger context, thereby creating new options for meaning and response. For example, as we lie on our blanket in the sun, perhaps we hear music in the distance. Someone passing by mentions a great restaurant in town. Suddenly we're thinking: Hey, there must be an amusement park nearby. If it's on the way to town, we can check out the rides before we look for the restaurant that passerby was talking about. In fact, maybe the guy knows about other places we should consider. Where did he go?
    • Ni would prompt us to liberate our sense impressions from their larger context, thereby creating new options for perception itself. For example, we might find ourselves wondering why people feel so strongly about getting a good tan. We remember reading somewhere that before the Industrial Revolution, being tan marked one as a manual laborer, because it suggested work out of doors. After the Industrial Revolution, it was pale skin that suggested manual labor, because it indicated work in a poorly lit factory. Such correlations aren't relevant today, but a good tan is still considered attractive. Why is that? We consider raising the question as a topic of conversation, but we're pretty sure our friends will think we're observing a situation instead of enjoying it.

    Because we usually associate Intuition with "feelings" and hunches, the conceptual nature of Ni may be difficult to appreciate. Like its Extraverted counterpart, Ni is a Perceiving function, but it's also a left-brain function. The left brain won't focus on many things at once. It depends on words and signs to make outward experience predictable and orderly.

    This is most clear in the areas governed by Te and Fe, the left-brain Judgment functions. ETJs and EFJs, whose Judgment skills are dominant, wield language like a knife, separating meaningful sense impressions from all the nameless experiential stuff that surrounds it. Such types may be hard pressed to grant the reality of impressions that can't be explained or talked about.

    The left-brain Perceiving functions are different. Si and Ni make us aware of all our sensory impressions, notwithstanding prevailing categories of knowledge. In consequence, ISJs and INJs tend to have interests and priorities that strike others as unpredictable or esoteric.

    On the other hand, as left-brain types, ISJs and INJs also need conceptual control over their outer world. For this reason, both types have a strong investment in the structure of public information. ISJs are concerned with making the structure secure, whereas INJs are interested in changing or improving it.

    For example, at a recent board meeting, an ISTJ accountant told the group that he enjoyed recording the organization's income and expenditures, but he didn't want to be involved with the money itself--counting it, bringing it to the bank, and so forth. This is a classic Si approach. Material reality is just so much raw experience. It has to be controlled with a stable mental framework.

    Ni moves us in the opposite direction. It tells us that changing our frame of mind can change the world. For example, a recent article advises the parents of a fussy or demanding baby not to describe the infant as difficult but to recognize that such children have vivid, strong, and rich personalities. This is how Ni works. The material facts remain the same, but we organize them in a new conceptual pattern that changes their meaning and gives us new options for behavior.

    Ni versus Ne

    Because Ne types also see life in terms of new perspectives, it's important to recognize the difference between ENPs and INJs. Motivated by functions that implicate opposite sides of the brain, these types are mirror images of each other.

    Ne types are right-brain types who deal with their sense impressions by unifying them into larger outward patterns. An ENP physician, for example, may realize, with sudden insight, that several unexplained symptoms are actually part of a single disease. As an Extraverted type, the physician has no doubt that the disease syndrome really exists. The pattern was always there, waiting for someone to discover it. What's important now is telling others about the discovery--getting people to see that the new model offers more options than the old.

    Ni types don't think this way. For INJs, patterns aren't "out there" in the world, waiting to be discovered. They're part of us--the way we make sense of the riot of information and energy impinging on our systems. A disease syndrome is a useful construct, but that's all it is--an aggregate of observations attached to a label, telling us what to see and how to deal with it.

    Given their real-life consequences, mental constructs don't strike INJs as imaginary or irrelevant. They're merely arbitrary, derived from a particular view of life. For this reason, they can trap us into holding that view--say, that physicians are in the business of cure rather than prevention--without being aware of its effects.

    Ni in Practice

    Most types rely on Ni to contend with ambiguities of meaning and perception--that is, to see that a situation can be acknowledged in more than one way. We may use it, for example, to acknowledge the possibility of both scientific and religious positions on life after death, or to deal with incompatible experiences of self and solidarity at work, at home, and among friends.

    It may seem peculiar, therefore, to depend on this function for one's primary understanding of reality. If INJs are seeing things from many (sometimes conflicting) perspectives, on what basis would they ever take action?

    It should be emphasized that INJs are very much like ENPs in this respect. Where Ne types see many behavioral options, INJs acknowledge many conceptual standpoints. They experience no need ...
    by Published on 09-29-2011 08:16 AM  Number of Views: 2150 
    1. Categories:
    2. Socionics,
    3. Intertype Relations
    Article Preview

    Classification of Intertype Relations According to Their Purpose and Energy Dynamics

    -by V.Gulenko

    Roles of Intertype Relations

    Original article: http://socionics.kiev.ua/articles/fe...oup/ascension/ (only sections 1-4 of this article have been translated)

    Psychological "division of labor" is a mark of a mature and rationally structured society. Ancient societies received powerful stimulus with invention of division of physical labor. We stand on the threshold of a new step forward when professional specialization will be supplemented by psychological one.

    The construction of such classification provides us with the answer to an important question: why does each intertype relation exist? Which relations are optimal for achieving these or that goals? Which communicative issues naturally arise for each type of relation? Using intertype relations for purposes that are different from their intended ones often leads to stress and frustration.

    Within each orientation, I will distinguish two sub-groups that are specialized for solving light tasks and serious or heavy tasks. Their separation is directly related to the Dynamic/Static dichotomy. Light relations (variety and expediency of communication) correspond to dynamic aspect, heavy relations (uniformity and thoroughness) – to static aspect.

    1. Research relations.

    This group ...

Live Chat Support