Quote:
well we know that that is a lie then.
Since official MBTI once 'reasoned' that the best match was someone with the opposite jungian dichotomies. INFP and ESTJ.
Though they actually did checked that, and they saw they were completely wrong. And from that moment they have never tried to make a relationship theorie based on mbti.
I once wrote to another site who claimed to have researched etc and told them that socionics claimed otherwise. I got the most amateuristic astrology based answer from the sitebuilder that I have given up debating with that kind of amateurs.
Socionics is correct. The rest is 'talking out of their asses'. You'll find out yourself soon enough when dating your conflictor :-)
But this is just part of the world, the internet is full of bullshit. Actually there's more bullshit then truth, so it takes a keen eye and 'test it yourself mentality' to filter it out.
|
Yeah, I tend to agree with you, though I was just curious what people would say. I've observed a good deal of socionics relations "in action" (was pretty into this long ago, so I've had a while)... and though I don't think socionics relations necessarily always pan out as stated in theory, I do certainly think they're the most accurate I've seen.
It's also supposedly an "award winning test"... which cracks me up, as there really seems to be nothing new.